A sensitive topic but below is my initial view on the security offered by those two platforms.
My view is that Android, being a more open platform, offers more capabilities (flash, access to the root system, extension slots, etc). However, because of this it offers a less secured experience out of the box.
Apple, by not allowing certain technologies such as flash (flash security issues are endless) and by limiting access to its root system alsolimits its security exposure compare to android devices.
A very important security feature is then offered by the app store screening process. Although not perfect by any means, it still gets rid of obvious bad or flawed apps and protects iOS users further.
None of the devices are bulletproof and both suffered some security issues:
– iOS: Worm on jail broken iPhone and phone lock bypass (fixed in iOS v4.2)
– Android:Core libraries are open and apps can have deeper...
>>[READ MORE]
The scary world of Social Media and geo tagging
#20 - Posted on
10 January 2011 - Author: SM - Category: Security, OSI
As the saying goes, “it is never too late”, and it is only recently that I created a twitter account.
I was convinced to do so after attending a SANS training course (more on that soon) where the instructor told us twitter was the best way to keep up to date and in touch with a great online security community.
I am not new to social media, but after “playing” with twitter for a few days I am both impressed and concerned!
Impressed because it is slick and indeed a great way to follow up some topics and keep in touch.
Concerned because it is a mine gold for wanna be thief!
It has been well publicized that people share far too much information on Facebook, information that can sometimes be used against them (by employers, people who dislike you, ex lovers, etc).
I feel however the micro blogging format of twitter invites more its users at describing and sharing mundane information such as what you eat, what you think, what you ...
>>[READ MORE]
PS3 Hacked and Cryptography
#19 - Posted on
7 January 2011 - Author: SM - Category: Security, Hacking, Cryptography
The recent hack on PS3 where the private key used by Sony to sign their games has been recovered is of course a very bad news for Sony. It finishes to open the door to piracy which started in January 2010. In theory, anyone could now sign (pirated) software to run natively on the PS3.
It is a case of badly implemented cryptography algorithm, in that case, the use a proprietary signing algorithm with a faulty random generator.
Crypto 101 says to NEVER use proprietary/secret algorithms. Now Sony’s will pay the price for not listening :)
The PS3 hack story is a great example of badly implemented cryptography which is as important as the choice of the security controls used to protect an asset.
BBC NEWS ARTICLE
The start of an answer from Sony, which seems to indicate they did not grasp the severity of the issue when first announced about a week ago
...
>>[READ MORE]
Interesting acquisitions
#18 - Posted on
5 January 2011 - Author: SM - Category: Security
2011 seems to cary on with the trend of security companies acquisitions by big IT names. This is now the turn of DELL to buy SecureWorks, planning to offer managed security services in a near future.
Another interesting acquisition is that of Immunet by Sourcefire, which should help the later company to grow its business “in the cloud”.
SaaS and “in the cloud” are two 2010 themes which are likely to grow even more this year.
...
>>[READ MORE]
“Freemium” user procurement Strategy
#17 - Posted on
13 November 2010 - Author: SM - Category: Misc
Although this post is not directly related to IT Security, some of its implications are.
Looking at the recent craze around iOS devices which is pushing many companies to react to its users bringing such devices in the corporate environment, I wonder if some kind of new and ever so slightly twisted corporate “Freemium” user procurement strategy could be extracted from this…
– Wait for a new “sexy” gadget to come along that everyone wants
– Offer a free and equivalent “boring”/cheaper gadget, which does the job and just that.
– Resist your users to provide that new gadget…
– …but do not resist that much so it does not work in your corporate environment
– Accept and work to mitigate the risks associated with those uncontrolled devices
– Wait for the number of those users to grow and pass a tipping point
– Officially accept the use of those new gadg...
>>[READ MORE]